| Welcome to Kurdistanboard forum. Hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Is Turkey in possession of Nuclear weapons? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 13 14, 4:10 (2,288 Views) | |
| RawandKurdistani | Jan 13 14, 4:10 Post #1 |
![]()
Surchi/Xoshnawi
![]()
|
The US has supplied some 480 B61 thermonuclear bombs to five so-called “non-nuclear states”, including Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey. Casually disregarded by the Vienna based UN Nuclear Watchdog (IAEA), the US has actively contributed to the proliferation of nuclear weapons in Western Europe. As part of this European stockpiling, Turkey, which is a partner of the US-led coalition against Iran along with Israel, possesses some 90 thermonuclear B61 bunker buster bombs at the Incirlik nuclear air base. (National Resources Defense Council, Nuclear Weapons in Europe , February 2005) By the recognised definition, these five countries are “undeclared nuclear weapons states”. The stockpiling and deployment of tactical B61 in these five “non-nuclear states” are intended for targets in the Middle East . Moreover, in accordance with “NATO strike plans”, these thermonuclear B61 bunker buster bombs (stockpiled by the “non-nuclear States”) could be launched “against targets in Russia or countries in the Middle East such as Syria and Iran” ( quoted in National Resources Defense Council, Nuclear Weapons in Europe , February 2005) ![]() http://www.globalresearch.ca/europe-s-five-undeclared-nuclear-weapons-states/17550 |
|
I am confused by God's wisdom: In this world of States Why have the Kurds remained Stateless, dispossessed, What for have they all become fugitives, condemned? Ahmad Khani Feed the hungry and visit a sick person And free the captive If he be unjustly confined Assist any person oppressed Whether Muslim or non-Muslim - Prophet Muhammad Ibn Abdullah (PBUH) | |
![]() |
|
| the SUN child | Jan 13 14, 6:27 Post #2 |
|
ZAGROS-ARYAN
![]()
|
No, Turkye is not in possession of Nuclear weapons. And it will NEVER be. Although there're some NATO-American based nuclear silos where American A-bombs are saved, but under the USA command. |
![]() |
|
| RawandKurdistani | Jan 13 14, 6:58 Post #3 |
![]()
Surchi/Xoshnawi
![]()
|
But they're there nonetheless, and America probably wouldn't mind if the Turks used one or two against us. This is a very dangerous situation. |
|
I am confused by God's wisdom: In this world of States Why have the Kurds remained Stateless, dispossessed, What for have they all become fugitives, condemned? Ahmad Khani Feed the hungry and visit a sick person And free the captive If he be unjustly confined Assist any person oppressed Whether Muslim or non-Muslim - Prophet Muhammad Ibn Abdullah (PBUH) | |
![]() |
|
| Worldwar2boy | Jan 13 14, 7:03 Post #4 |
![]()
|
US won't give away nuclear weapons or even allow it to be used. If Turkey (or any other country) uses nukes, it will be nuked by the rest of the world. That's why nobody uses nukes. You use nukes, you die. Edited by Worldwar2boy, Jan 13 14, 7:04.
|
| biji kurd u kurdistan !! | |
![]() |
|
| Fire | Jan 13 14, 7:06 Post #5 |
![]() ![]()
|
America also closed their eyes and supported Turkey when Turks had used many times chemical weapons against our PKK warriors. But what has happened? We are as strong as ever, it always seems that whenever Turkish subhumans are commiting crimes, Kurds are getting even stronger. They won't stop us, no matter what they are doing. Turkey would have been defeated a long time ago if American and other Western bastards wouldn't support them so much. That's the most annoying thing for us. Our strength is still not strong enough to pull off the final killing stroke against the heavily supported Turkey. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jan 13 14, 7:18 Post #6 |
|
Deleted User
|
Thats true only if the receiving end have nuclear weapons themselves. You see, no country would risk their own existence to follow the "international laws" and "human rights". Anyway, back to the article; Turkey have no power over these nuclear weapons. US is in total control of them. Unless US approves use of these weapons and "opens the door" for Turkey, they can't be used by Turkey. Turkey do have undeclared stockpiles of chemical weapons tho. Turkey can and have used them without the international world lifting one eyelid. |
|
|
| Ali Alqosh | Jan 13 14, 7:41 Post #7 |
![]()
|
That's not entirely true! Since America and Russia are in the possession of 4000 nuclear warheads, 250 is enough to "destroy" the world. Basically everuthing. The air will be so filthy that we probably can't breath without difficulties. Then there's also the country who is getting nuked allies. They most likely have strong allies. Dillema: If Turkey nukes Kurdistan don't you think Russia will se it as an opportunity? ![]() EDIT: Had to keep it short since my phone is dying!
Edited by Ali Alqosh, Jan 13 14, 7:43.
|
![]() |
|
| Worldwar2boy | Jan 13 14, 7:48 Post #8 |
![]()
|
Turkey won't be nuked because they killed innocent Kurds, the rest of the world will nuke the shizz out of every Turk's sorry ass that has ever walked the earth because they will officially be a MAJOR threat to the world society as a whole, for using nuclear weapons in the first place. Every damn filthy Turk will be send to hell and the graves where they filthy fascist ancestors are buried, will turn into dust. The Turk will be completely forgotten and the word 'Turk' will be deleted from the internet dictionary. Those shitfaces won't use nukes, they might be able to purchase conventional weapons, but that's only because other countries need/want to make money. They won't allow such a backward nation to get hold of such deadly weapons. |
| biji kurd u kurdistan !! | |
![]() |
|
| the SUN child | Jan 13 14, 8:14 Post #9 |
|
ZAGROS-ARYAN
![]()
|
No, impossible. Those are American nukes. Americans are just using / leasing their territory. Turkye is getting paid for that. American soldier and generals are supervising and monitoring their own nuclear weapons, Turanic monkey Turks have nothing to do with that. There's also an American Air Base in Incirlik, this doesn't mean that the Turanic monkeys can also use America fighter jets. The USA will never allow Turkye to make its own nuclear weapons! Edited by the SUN child, Jan 13 14, 8:16.
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jan 13 14, 8:50 Post #10 |
|
Deleted User
|
Why would Russia see it as an opportunity? They lose much more than they gain by bombing Turkey with nuclear weapons. They might get political gains if Turkey bombs Kurdish territory by taking it into UN and show NATO and co as aggressors, plus by denouncing them they could show themselves as a alternative military power that could rival NATO (as in the cold war years. Unfortunately, that is only a bluff. Nowadays US alone is far superior than any other military power on earth). Russia would however not make a military move against Turkey. The word ally is a word nowadays misused to describe countries who have good ties. An ally is someone who is by treaty bonded to a nation, like NATO. Also, no ally in today's world would offer themselves to save another ally, because countries remain allies for as long at it serves both sides interests. You remember US during the Georgia invasion in 2008? No serious military action against Russia even so they said they would act militarily. |
|
|
| Ali Alqosh | Jan 13 14, 5:54 Post #11 |
![]()
|
I mean if it were to serve both sides interrests
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jan 15 14, 2:05 Post #12 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well, yes, then Russia would see a opportunity to make Kurdistan a puppet state (if we are independent. If not, it would use us to start rebellions in the occupying states when they need to put pressure on them, like major powers have done throughout history) of its own. They would take use of the strong emotional feelings that would follow an nuclear strikes against our brothers and sisters to gain its influence in Kurdistan, and not by military means (and they would certainly not take up arms against Turkey and co because of the strike) |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Middle East · Next Topic » |













7:18 PM Jul 11